HomeAfrican AmericansBlack Confederates at Milliken’s Bend?

Comments

Black Confederates at Milliken’s Bend? — 4 Comments

  1. Hello, this topic always intrigued me as to how people twist facts to meet their need. I actually have a document from the CS conscript office in Richmond detailing exactly how many Blacks had been drafted for service at that time. when I bring that to peoples attention they claim a slave being drafted wasnt used for combat purposes. my answer is always so what? Many white men were drafted into service during subsequent wars and served as cooks, clerks, engineers,seabees etc. does that mean they werent considered soldiers? I bet they would claim they were if you asked them. so why would blackman, regardless if they were drafted, volunteered or even a slave who was taken into service by his master and served beside him, why who he not be considered a soldier? truth is there were more than a few hundred. granted not as many that served in teh union, but still they served.

  2. Thanks for your comment. I’m sorry I haven’t yet had a chance to post some of the related information I have about this subject, specifically as it relates to Milliken’s Bend.
    However, to respond more directly, I would state that I do make a distinction between slaves who went with their masters and African-Americans, slave or free, who served as soldiers. Slaves who went with their masters, typically as body servants usually:
    1) did not get paid for their service
    2) were not carried on military muster rolls
    3) were not eligible for *soldiers* pensions (though some states explicitly *did* provide pensions for “loyal slaves”)
    I believe these are important distinctions between a soldier, versus a servant/slave.
    Again, Kevin Levin (links above) writes much more extensively about this subject as it applies throughout the Confederacy.
    Stay tuned; I’ll get some of these additional posts related to this topic and Milliken’s Bend online within the next few months.
    Thanks for stopping by.

  3. I thank you for writing this book about an important and too little known battle of the war. I watched your televised booktalk. I do think it’s very important to debunk this notion of black Confederate soldiers if you are asked this question again. Black people “served” the Confederates as enslaved laborers and only in the last weeks of the war did the desperate Confederates approve the use of blacks as soldiers. That idea countered their entire reason for being–that is–their belief in the inherent inferiority of blacks.The Louisiana Native Guards were allowed to be a part of the Louisiana state militia briefly–but they were never Confederate soldiers. The many former slaves who received pensions from southern states did so as Servants, clearly marked on the application form. Someone also asked you about blacks slaves being drafted and I believed you answered they were not-thousands of escaped slaves were drafted all over the Union.

    I thank you for your contribution about the battle. I am glad you are familiar with Kevin Levin’s work–also please see Donald Scheaffer’s wonderful blog and related post here: here:http://cwemancipation.wordpress.com/2014/01/02/black-confederates-patrick-cleburnes-radical-proposal/

    Kind regards~

    • Robyn – Thank you so much for your comment and feedback. I really appreciate your further thoughts and suggestions on this, and the link to the specific post at Civil War Emancipation. I do intend to post more on this subject, though primarily as it relates to Milliken’s Bend. I agree with the first paragraph of Shaffer’s post, preferring to leave the more detailed discrediting of this myth to others. I too am concerned that by giving the matter more press, it risks giving more credence to this myth than it deserves. There are many more stories of all types about Milliken’s Bend that I hope to post, and I feel my time is best devoted to that. Thank you again for your comment, and for stopping by.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>